The thing being evaluated (program, product, process, personnel, or policy) is referred to as the evaluand.
Evaluators seek to understand how the evaluand is operating, and the impact of that evaluand on organizations and community/societies.
Evaluators then inform relevant stakeholders of the evaluation results and make recommendations to them on how to improve the evaluand.
Evaluators work with stakeholders and subject matter experts to answer questions such as:
1. What are we evaluating (the evaluand)?
2. What is the background information and current situation of the evaluand?
3. What are the criteria and standards that govern the evaluand?
4. How does the evaluand measure up to the established criteria and standards?
5. What must happen in order to improve the evaluand?
The main difference between Research and Evaluation:
The main difference between research and evaluation is that:
Research is usually is designed to provide results that go beyond an individual program or project and can be generalised to other populations, conditions, or times. This places additional requirements on research.
Evaluation on the other hand, usually focuses on a situation, such as collecting data about specific programmes, with no intent to generalise the results to other settings and situations.
In other words, research generalises, evaluation particularises.
Thus Evaluation considers the results on the population being served by the program or project within the context in which the program is provided. Research asks whether the population has the same characteristics as other groups and whether results can be applied in other contexts.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH CHEAP NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
The post What is Evaluation? Is a systematic process that determines the merit or worth of programmes, products, processes, personnel, and/or policies. appeared first on Cheap Nursing Tutors.

WhatsApp us