Issue Paper
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Very Good |
Good |
Acceptable |
Does Not Meet Key Standards |
|
Content and analysis: Thesis |
12.5 points strong, analytical thesis |
10 points thesis clear, but more descriptive than analytical |
7.5 points thesis only descriptive |
5 points thesis unclear |
2.5 points no thesis |
|
Content and Analysis: Interpretation |
12.5 points original interpretation of material |
10 points interpretation not original but clearly expressed |
7.5 points interpretation relies heavily on other works |
5 points no interpretation, just description |
2.5 points lack of interpretation and description |
|
Content and Analysis: Understanding the Model |
12.5 points demonstrates understanding of the model |
10 points mostly demonstrates understanding of the model |
7.5 points demonstrates some understanding of the model |
5 points errors in applying the model |
2.5 points lack of understanding of model |
|
Content and Analysis: Use of Sources |
12.5 points consistent and effective use of three or more primary sources and eight or more secondary sources |
10 points consistent and effective use of two primary sources and seven secondary sources |
7.5 points incorporation of one primary source and six secondary sources |
5 points incorporation of one primary source and five secondary sources |
2.5 points incorporation of no primary sources and four or fewer secondary sources |
|
Structure and organization |
15 points organization contributes to effectiveness of argument |
12 points organization is mostly logical, but could use improvement |
9 points organization is confusing; it is difficult to follow the analysis and narrative |
6 points organization is poor; analysis and narrative are garbled |
3 points organization is nonexistent; analysis and narrative do not make any sense |
|
Writing style: Sentence Construction |
3.75 points sentences are well-constructed |
3 points sentences are mostly well-constructed |
2.25 points sentences are often unclear |
1.75 points sentences are often unintelligible |
0.75 points writing unacceptably substandard |
|
Writing Style: Word Choice |
3.75 points excellent word choice |
3 points generally appropriate word choice |
2.25 points word choice is often poor |
1.5 points word choice has obvious errors |
0.75 points word choice has severe errors |
|
Writing Style: Use of Sources |
3.75 points sources are used correctly and integrated into the paper |
3 points sources are mostly used correctly and integrated into the paper |
2.25 points sources are mostly used correctly, but are not integrated effectively into the paper |
1.5 points incorrect use of sources; lack of integration of sources |
0.75 points sources used poorly or not at all |
|
Writing Style: Transitions |
3.75 points transitions are clear and easy to follow |
3 points transitions are mostly clear and easy to follow |
2.25 points transitions abrupt |
1.5 points lack of transitions |
0.75 points no transitions |
|
Spelling, grammar, and punctuation |
10 points paper has 0–1 spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors |
8 points paper has 2–3 spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors |
6 points paper has 4–5 spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors |
4 points paper has 6–7 spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors |
2 points paper has eight or more spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors |
|
Documentation |
10 points paper has no more than one error in citation (formatting or use) |
8 points paper has 2–3 errors in citation |
6 points paper has 4–5 errors in citation |
4 points paper has 6–7 errors in citation |
2 points paper has eight or more errors in citation |

WhatsApp us