Select an article from a peer-reviewed nursing journal regarding an EBP process or implementation.
Write a summary of 750-1,000 words that includes the following criteria:
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric (CHECK BELOW). Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Benchmark – Evidenced-Based Practice (EBP) Summary
1 No Submission 0.00% |
2 Unsatisfactory 75.00% |
3 Less Than Satisfactory 80.00% |
4 Satisfactory 88.00% |
5 Good 92.00% |
6 Excellent 100.00% |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
70.0 %Content | |||||||
15.0 %Introduction to EBP Project Selected from a Peer-Reviewed Nursing Journal | None | Introduction is absent from summary. | Introduction is vague, and does not fully describe the evidence-based project presented in the article. | Introduction is brief, but fully describes the evidence-based practice project presented in the article. | Introduction gives a clear and complete description of the evidence-based practice project presented in the article. | Introduction is thorough and explicitly describes the evidence-based practice project presented in the article. | |
20.0 %Summary of Key Points of EBP Project | None | Summary is absent. | Summary is brief, and insufficiently addresses the key components of the article. | Summary is concise, and partially addresses most of the key components of the article. | Summary is comprehensive and completely addresses most of the key points of the article. | Summary is comprehensive and completely addresses each of the key points of the article. | |
10.0 %List of Steps taken by Nursing to start and implement the EBP | None | List of steps is absent. | List of steps is incomplete. | List of steps is complete, but lacks clear details and organization. | List of steps is complete and well-organized, but lacks clear details. | List of steps is complete, detailed, and well-organized. | |
25.0 %Application of the information learned from EBP. | None | Application of learned information is absent. | Application of EBP is described, but is an inappropriate match. | EBP is applied to an appropriate example, but effectiveness is inadequately supported. | EBP is applied to an appropriate example. Support and justification for effectiveness is explained. | EBP is successfully applied to an appropriate example. Support and justification for effectiveness is clearly outlined. | |
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | |||||||
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose | None | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |
8.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions | None | Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. | |
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | None | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register); sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
10.0 %Format | |||||||
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | None | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) | None | No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
WhatsApp us