*PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW ALL DIRECTIONS CAREFULLY AND CORRECTLY. PLEASE NO PLAGARISM. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS AND DO ASSIGNMENT CORRECTLY AND COMPLETELY.* My research question that I posted for M1 Assignment 2 is attached.
The foundation of a research study comes from an understanding of the theory and from knowledge that is set forth by the literature in the field. Before a researcher can develop a sound and needed research design, he or she must first determine what is already known, how the topic has previously been studied, and where there are gaps in the knowledge and/or techniques that have been used to study the research problem.
In this module, you will further explore the research topic that you chose in M1 Assignment 2. Additionally, this will be the time to make any needed changes to your research question before you submit your proposal in M5 Assignment 2 RA 2. For this assignment, you will create a 3- to 4-page document following the directions given below.
Using the Argosy University online library resources and the Internet, locate 6 peer-reviewed articles that could be used for the literature review portion of the research proposal in M5 Assignment 2 RA 2. The articles should fall into the following categories:
For each article, cover the following points in 250–350 words:
Present your work in a 3- to 5-page Microsoft Word document that follows the following format:
All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.
Submission Details:
RA is worth 200 points and will be graded according to the following rubric.
| Assignment Component | Proficient | Maximum Points |
| Select an article that meets specifications. |
Selected a peer-reviewed article from a forensic psychology journal. |
24 |
| Identify the rationale, purpose, problem, need, and research question contained within the selected article. |
Stated the key elements of the article including, rationale, purpose, problem need, and research question. |
44 |
| Discuss whether the authors stated the type of research that was conducted (qualitative or quantitative). |
Correctly identified whether the research study employed a qualitative or quantitative approach. |
28 |
| Critique whether the authors supported the need for the study with appropriate literature. |
Provided a substantive critique on whether the authors justified their research. |
28 |
| Use research terminology and language suitable for evaluating a scholarly article. |
Included research terms in your writing and discussed them with familiarity and correct application. |
28 |
| Identify the strengths and weaknesses of the research investigation with respect to rationale, purpose, need, problem, and research question. | Provided a discussion of the strong and weak parts of the article for the rationale, purpose, problem need, and research question. |
28 |
| Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. |
Writing is generally clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension. In-text citations and references are in proper APA style. . |
20 |
| Total: |
200 |

WhatsApp us