Thomson writes, “What I will discuss are two of the moral arguments that have been put forward as reasons for objecting to the legalization of physician-assisted suicide. They have been taken seriously by a great many people and have had a powerful impact on the state of American law in this area. I will argue that they are bad arguments” (497). What is the second argument against legalization that Thomson discusses? What reasons does Thomson give for thinking that it is a bad argument? Is she correct that it is a bad argument?

Your paper is supposed to focus on what Thomson says in her article, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: Two Moral Arguments.” More specifically, in that article, Thomson discusses two arguments that purport to show that physician-assisted suicide should not be legalized. She discusses the first argument on pgs. 500–508, and she discusses the second argument on pgs. 509—516. You were supposed to examine the second argument that Thomson discusses—the one that she talks about on pgs. 509—516. You were supposed to tell us how that argument goes, and why Thomson thinks that it is ultimately a bad argument

1. Introduction paragraph have a sophisticated thesis reveals an in-depth analysis of the text and give appropriate background information. Innovative, original introduction that indicates writer’s grasp of topic, purpose and audience. clearly lay out the main things will do in the paper.

2. Body paragraph exhibits a sophisticated and coherent structure through skillful placement of ideas and effective transitioning.

Ideas are original, clearly developed and supported with effective, relevant, and specific references in order to analyze the text. 3 citations are correctly used and placed.

Utilizes terminology appropriate to genre, chooses distinct words, and varies sentence length and grammatical structure to create an original and confident voice both fitting to the purpose of the essay and intended audience.

Body paragraph include:

Make sure describe the second argument against legalization that Thomson discusses. And talking about what are your thoughts about this section of the paper

Please accurately reconstruct the argument. Make the reconstruction of that argument illuminating, helping the reader to fully understand what the argument is.

Discuss your opinions about Thomson’s reply to that “argument”? what are your thoughts about this part of the paper?

Accurately describe what Thomson’s response is.

Take a stand on whether the second argument against legalization is sound. is their position presented clearly? Do you agree with what the author says in this part of his paper?

Make sure your analysis and argument easy to follow, also make it thoughtful/insightful?

3. Conclusion leaving reader satisfied and thinking. Mastery of conventions: no spelling, punctuation or format errors

Repeat thesis statement, and is author argument sound? do you agree and disagree? why?

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.