Assume the editor of a journal has sent you this paper to review in order to determine whether or not he or she should allocate valuable journal space to it.

Assume the editor of a journal has sent you this paper to review in order to determine whether or not he or she should allocate valuable journal space to it. Write a comprehensive review and critique of this article.

a. Your paper should be in APA 6th edition format. Please see http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ for guidelines on how to format an APA 6th edition paper. The only guideline you can skip is the inclusion of an abstract. To be clear, your paper does not need to have an abstract. Please follow all of the other guidelines.

b . Your paper should summarize and explain the author’s main arguments , as well as the support the author provides for those arguments.

c. You should also evaluate the author’s arguments , being sure to cite the strengths and weaknesses you find. That is, what did the authors do well (and why is it right), what didn’t they do well (and why isn’t it the best approach), what could they have done differently, etc…
i. Do not simply give me your opinion. Do your research, and back your statements up with resources, making sure to cite those references.
ii. Back up at least two of these strengths and/or weaknesses with additional research. They must be articles that were not already cited by the authors (Blair & Kaserman).
iii. Be sure to cite these references, both in the text and in the bibliography,
according to APA 6th edition style.

d. Don’t simply structure your paper around these points; instead you should consider ???????????them significant aspects of a well-rounded piece of writing.

e. Don’t forget to suggest to the editor whether or not the journal’s audience would appreciate the article; i.e. should the editor publish it or reject it.

4. In addition to the review and critique described in (2), elaborate on the ethical dilemma discussed in the paper. That is, what is the “right” thing to do, and why. Remember, do not just give me your opinion. Back your statements up with resources, being sure to cite them.

a. Cite at least three references, two of which must be articles that were not already cited by the authors (Blair & Kaserman).

b. Be sure to cite these references, both in the text and in the bibliography, according to APA 6th edition style.

5. Below are a few sources containing information about writing a critical review. Take a look at these prior to writing your paper.
http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/review.html
http://www.lc.unsw.edu.au/onlib/critrev.html http://www.hccfl.edu/adjunct/darren_smith/bbs-gwcr.htm

Please do not quote unless absolutely necessary. It is generally better to provide the information in your own words and cite the source.
Finally, please be sure to proofread your paper, and if possible, have someone else proofread it, as it is often difficult to catch your own mistakes after having spent so much time with it.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH CHEAP NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

The post Assume the editor of a journal has sent you this paper to review in order to determine whether or not he or she should allocate valuable journal space to it. appeared first on Cheap Nursing Tutors.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.