Assignment 3: Evaluation of Agency’s Ethics, Cooperation, Leadership, and Legal Decisions
Due Week 6 and worth 270 points
As a consultant, you need to develop an in-depth analysis and evaluation of the selected Agency’s Ethics, Cooperation, Leadership, and Legal Decisions and then provide recommendations for improvement. Therefore, you will conduct interviews with agency representatives and research-related academic sources and government Websites. The analysis will be read by the VP of Accounts and Client Support as well as by the leaders of the agency for whom you are working.
Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:
(Note: Follow the Guidelines for Interview Assignments at Strayer University provided with Assignment 1.)
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Analyze leadership models, theories, characteristics, and skills.
Examine ethical issues and legal statues related to the various elements of public administration.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in public administration.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 270 |
Assignment 3: Evaluation of Agency’s Ethics, Cooperation, Leadership, and Legal Decisions |
|||
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Analyze two to three (2-3) current events from the past two years (using the e-Activity* in Week 4) focusing on the administrative responsibility and ethical implications to the stakeholders, organization, and public regarding the issues in described in the current event. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed two to three (2-3) current events from the past two years (using the e-Activity* in Week 4) focusing on the administrative responsibility and ethical implications to the stakeholders, organization, and public regarding the issues in described in the current event. |
Partially analyzed two to three (2-3) current events from the past two years (using the e-Activity* in Week 4) focusing on the administrative responsibility and ethical implications to the stakeholders, organization, and public regarding the issues in described in the current event. |
Satisfactorily analyzed two to three (2-3) current events from the past two years (using the e-Activity* in Week 4) focusing on the administrative responsibility and ethical implications to the stakeholders, organization, and public regarding the issues in described in the current event. |
Thoroughly analyzed two to three (2-3) current events from the past two years (using the e-Activity* in Week 4) focusing on the administrative responsibility and ethical implications to the stakeholders, organization, and public regarding the issues in described in the current event. |
2. Assess the leadership of this agency (in light of leadership models) and of the political context in which the agency operates, highlighting at least three (3) ways internal agency leaders and political leaders have influenced the success and / or failure of the agency. |
Did not submit or incompletely assessed the leadership of this agency (in light of leadership models) and of the political context in which the agency operates, highlighting at least three (3) ways internal agency leaders and political leaders have influenced the success and / or failure of the agency. |
Partially assessed the leadership of this agency (in light of leadership models) and of the political context in which the agency operates, highlighting at least three (3) ways internal agency leaders and political leaders have influenced the success and / or failure of the agency. |
Satisfactorily assessed the leadership of this agency (in light of leadership models) and of the political context in which the agency operates, highlighting at least three (3) ways internal agency leaders and political leaders have influenced the success and / or failure of the agency. |
Thoroughly assessed the leadership of this agency (in light of leadership models) and of the political context in which the agency operates, highlighting at least three (3) ways internal agency leaders and political leaders have influenced the success and / or failure of the agency. |
3. Analyze the power the agency has in enforcing the regulations they are asked to uphold (using the e-Activity in Week 5). Discuss two to three (2-3) challenges to enforce the agency’s regulations. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the power the agency has in enforcing the regulations they are asked to uphold (using the e-Activity in Week 5). Did not submit or incompletely discussed two to three (2-3) challenges to enforce the agency’s regulations. |
Partially analyzed the power the agency has in enforcing the regulations they are asked to uphold (using the e-Activity in Week 5). Partially discussed two to three (2-3) challenges to enforce the agency’s regulations. |
Satisfactorily analyzed the power the agency has in enforcing the regulations they are asked to uphold (using the e-Activity in Week 5). Satisfactorily discussed two to three (2-3) challenges to enforce the agency’s regulations. |
Thoroughly analyzed the power the agency has in enforcing the regulations they are asked to uphold (using the e-Activity in Week 5). Thoroughly discussed two to three (2-3) challenges to enforce the agency’s regulations. |
WhatsApp us