Contract Cost and Documentation for the Navy
Worth 300 points
Based on the same scenario as in Assignments 1, 2, 3 and 4, you are now considering the final factors needed for your proposal based on RFP #123456789, dated 07/14/2014.
Additional factors to consider are:
Write a eight (8) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 300 |
Assignment 5: Contract Cost and Documentation for the Navy |
||||
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Determine the payment type (i.e., receiving progress payments, performance-based payments, or partial payments) you will use in your bid. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined the payment type (i.e., receiving progress payments, performance-based payments, or partial payments) you will use in your bid. Did not provide or incompletely provided a rationale for your response. |
Insufficiently determined the payment type (i.e., receiving progress payments, performance-based payments, or partial payments) you will use in your bid. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response. |
Partially determined the payment type (i.e., receiving progress payments, performance-based payments, or partial payments) you will use in your bid. Partially provided a rationale for your response. |
Satisfactorily determined the payment type (i.e., receiving progress payments, performance-based payments, or partial payments) you will use in your bid. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. |
Thoroughly determined the payment type (i.e., receiving progress payments, performance-based payments, or partial payments) you will use in your bid. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. |
2. Determine the approach and the key terms that you would consider in requesting the use of the Navy’s floor equipment. Provide a rationale for your response. |
Did not submit or incompletely determined the approach and the key terms that you would consider in requesting the use of the Navy’s floor equipment. Did not provide or incompletely provided a rationale for your response. |
Insufficiently determined the approach and the key terms that you would consider in requesting the use of the Navy’s floor equipment. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response. |
Partially determined the approach and the key terms that you would consider in requesting the use of the Navy’s floor equipment. Partially provided a rationale for your response. |
Satisfactorily determined the approach and the key terms that you would consider in requesting the use of the Navy’s floor equipment. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. |
Thoroughly determined the approach and the key terms that you would consider in requesting the use of the Navy’s floor equipment. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. |
3. Propose the quality control and inspection procedures that you believe should be included in your proposal. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely proposed the quality control and inspection procedures that you believe should be included in your proposal. Did not provide or incompletely provided a rationale for your response. |
Insufficiently proposed the quality control and inspection procedures that you believe should be included in your proposal. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response. |
Partially proposed the quality control and inspection procedures that you believe should be included in your proposal. Partially provided a rationale for your response. |
Satisfactorily proposed the quality control and inspection procedures that you believe should be included in your proposal. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. |
Thoroughly proposed the quality control and inspection procedures that you believe should be included in your proposal. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. |
4. Determine, because of your company’s private patent on the specialty floor coating, whether the Navy would or would not have a patent infringement objection for the use of the coating. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined, because of your company’s private patent on the specialty floor coating, whether the Navy would or would not have a patent infringement objection for the use of the coating. Did not provide or incompletely provided a rationale for your response. |
Insufficiently determined, because of your company’s private patent on the specialty floor coating, whether the Navy would or would not have a patent infringement objection for the use of the coating. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response. |
Partially determined, because of your company’s private patent on the specialty floor coating, whether the Navy would or would not have a patent infringement objection for the use of the coating. Partially provided a rationale for your response. |
Satisfactorily determined, because of your company’s private patent on the specialty floor coating, whether the Navy would or would not have a patent infringement objection for the use of the coating. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. |
Thoroughly determined, because of your company’s private patent on the specialty floor coating, whether the Navy would or would not have a patent infringement objection for the use of the coating. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. |
5. Determine the mechanism for contract closeout your company would use with the Navy. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined the mechanism for contract closeout your company would use with the Navy. Did not provide or incompletely provided a rationale for your response. |
Insufficiently determined the mechanism for contract closeout your company would use with the Navy. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response. |
Partially determined the mechanism for contract closeout your company would use with the Navy. Partially provided a rationale for your response. |
Satisfactorily determined the mechanism for contract closeout your company would use with the Navy. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. |
Thoroughly determined the mechanism for contract closeout your company would use with the Navy. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. |
6. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
7. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting Weight: 5% |
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. |
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
8. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section (if applicable, might not apply to some 100 level courses such as ACC100) Weight: 5% |
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section. |
In-text citations and references are given, but not in APA format. |
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style. |
Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style. |
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style. |
9. Information Literacy/Integration of Sources Weight: 5% |
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations. |
Sources are rarely integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. |
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. |
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. |
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. |
10. Clarity and Coherence of Writing Weight: 5% |
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
Information is somewhat confusing with not enough reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
WhatsApp us