Case Study 3: Security
Points: 100 |
Case Study 3: Security |
|||
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Analyze the new system and determine the design issues with this new system. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the new system and did not submit or incompletely determined the design issues with this new system. |
Partially analyzed the new system and partially determined the design issues with this new system. |
Satisfactorily analyzed the new system and satisfactorily determined the design issues with this new system. |
Thoroughly analyzed the new system and thoroughly determined the design issues with this new system. |
2. Describe how you would correct the design issues with the system to make the restaurant managers happy. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely described how you would correct the design issues with the system to make the restaurant managers happy. |
Partially described how you would correct the design issues with the system to make the restaurant managers happy. |
Satisfactorily described how you would correct the design issues with the system to make the restaurant managers happy. |
Thoroughly described how you would correct the design issues with the system to make the restaurant managers happy. |
3a. Create a design plan that lists and explains the tasks associated with improving this interface. Weight: 3% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that lists and explains the tasks associated with improving this interface.
|
Partially created a design plan that lists and explains the tasks associated with improving this interface.
|
Satisfactorily created a design plan that lists and explains the tasks associated with improving this interface.
|
Thoroughly created a design plan that lists and explains the tasks associated with improving this interface.
|
3b. Create a design plan that contains at least six (6) tasks. Weight: 3% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that contains at least six (6) tasks.
|
Partially created a design plan that contains at least six (6) tasks. |
Satisfactorily created a design plan that contains at least six (6) tasks. |
Thoroughly created a design plan that contains at least six (6) tasks. |
3c. Create a design plan that includes realistic time estimates for each task to be completed. Weight: 3% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that includes realistic time estimates for each task to be completed. |
Partially created a design plan that includes realistic time estimates for each task to be completed. |
Satisfactorily created a design plan that includes realistic time estimates for each task to be completed. |
Thoroughly created a design plan that includes realistic time estimates for each task to be completed. |
3d. Create a design plan that analyzes the development of the system in your plan. Weight: 2% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that analyzes the development of the system in your plan. |
Partially created a design plan that analyzes the development of the system in your plan. |
Satisfactorily created a design plan that analyzes the development of the system in your plan. |
Thoroughly created a design plan that analyzes the development of the system in your plan. |
3e. Create a design plan that analyzes the testing of the system in your plan. Weight: 2% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that analyzes the testing of the system in your plan. |
Partially created a design plan that analyzes the testing of the system in your plan. |
Satisfactorily created a design plan that analyzes the testing of the system in your plan. |
Thoroughly created a design plan that analyzes the testing of the system in your plan. |
3f. Create a design plan that analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan. Weight: 2% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan. |
Partially created a design plan that analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan. |
Satisfactorily created a design plan that analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan. |
Thoroughly created a design plan that analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan. |
4. Examine how this system balanced security and usability, and explain the challenges of incorporating system security and system usability into a design. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely examined how this system balanced security and usability and did not submit or incompletely explained the challenges of incorporating system security and system usability into a design. |
Partially examined how this system balanced security and usability and partially explained the challenges of incorporating system security and system usability into a design. |
Satisfactorily examined how this system balanced security and usability and satisfactorily explained the challenges of incorporating system security and system usability into a design. |
Thoroughly examined how this system balanced security and usability and thoroughly explained the challenges of incorporating system security and system usability into a design. |
5. Suggest changes that could be made to the security of this system to still meet security objectives but make the system more usable. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely suggested changes that could be made to the security of this system to still meet security objectives but make the system more usable. |
Partially suggested changes that could be made to the security of this system to still meet security objectives but make the system more usable. |
Satisfactorily suggested changes that could be made to the security of this system to still meet security objectives but make the system more usable. |
Thoroughly suggested changes that could be made to the security of this system to still meet security objectives but make the system more usable. |
6. Use Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed interface. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed interface. |
Partially used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed interface. |
Satisfactorily used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed interface. |
Thoroughly used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed interface. |
7. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
WhatsApp us