DESCRIBE EVENTS LEADING UP TO AND REASON/S FOR ADMISSION OF PATIENT. RATIONALE FOR ADMISSION WITH INCLUSION OF PATIENT RISKS.
Critically reflect on and appraise the utility of management theory in the development and functioning of health systems and the delivery of health services
May 2, 2021Analyze a neuropsychological disorder .This week, you will analyze a neuropsychological disorder that is different from the topic you chose for your Final Project. Select a neuropsychological disorder from the following list, which is based on the DSM-5:
May 2, 2021DESCRIBE EVENTS LEADING UP TO AND REASON/S FOR ADMISSION OF PATIENT. RATIONALE FOR ADMISSION WITH INCLUSION OF PATIENT RISKS.
DESCRIBE EVENTS LEADING UP TO AND REASON/S FOR ADMISSION OF PATIENT. RATIONALE FOR ADMISSION WITH INCLUSION OF PATIENT RISKS.
NURS2005 Assignment 5: Viva Voce analysis marking rubric
This academic paper requires students to discuss their viva vocepatient investigated inassignment 2.
Students need to utilise the feedback provided by their PEP Facilitator and their own personal reflection on their practice since presenting this patient in their viva voce.
Student Name: _______________ ________ ID:_________________________________
Performance Standard:
Assessment Criteria: Weight: Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Part 1: Introduction:
Introduction identifies details of patient.
5% Comprehensive introduction to the patient.
Confidentiality maintained Introduction to the patient and purpose of the paper clearly described. Confidentiality maintained
Introduction to the patient and purpose of the paper described however, some areas / points confusing. Confidentiality maintained No introduction to the patient and / or purpose of the paper.
Confidentiality not maintained.
Situation:
Describe events leading up to and reason/s for admission of patient. Rationale for admission with inclusion of patient risks.
5% Comprehensive description of events leading to and reasons for admission of patient. Excellent, rationale linked topatient risks. Description of events leading to and reasons for admission of patient are clear. Rationale good, with clear links to patient risks. Broad description of events leading to and reasons for admission of patient– not always clear. Rationale, unclear, however, clear links topatient risks. No or minimal description of events/ reasons leading to admission.
No or poor rationale, no linking to patient risks.
Background:
Display understanding oflinks between presenting signs and symptoms and pathophysiological/ pharmacological changesevident on admission.
30% Displays comprehensive understanding of pathophysiological/ pharmacological changes linked explicitly to presenting signs and symptoms.
Presents good understanding of pathophysiological/ pharmacological changes linked to all presenting signs and symptoms.
General / broad understanding of pathophysiological/ pharmacological changes linked to most presenting signs and symptoms.
No more than two unclear links. No or unsatisfactory understanding presented of pathophysiological/ pharmacological changes. No or discussion linking changes to signs and symptoms is incorrect.
Confusing, incorrect /poor understanding presented.
Assessment:
Display understanding of assessment (vital signs, history, physical etc) and diagnostic (Xray, bloods, ECG etc) activities/ tests through critical evaluation of collected data to show how these activities informed the patients plan for management of care.
20% Comprehensive understanding of assessment and diagnostic activities/tests.
Comprehensive critical analysis of the collected data, supported with evidence.
Comprehensive discussion on how data informed plan for management of care. Good understanding of assessment and diagnostic activities/tests presented.
Clear critical analysis of the collected data, supported with evidence.
Good discussion on how data informed plan for management of care. Satisfactory understanding of assessment and diagnostic activities/tests. Sometimes unclear/ confusing/ not all aspects considered.
Limited but accurate critical analysis of the collected data. , supported with evidence.
Satisfactory discussion on how data informed plan for management of care. Links not always evident. No or unsatisfactory understanding of assessment and diagnostic activities/tests presented.
No/ unsatisfactory/ incorrect critical analysis of data collected.No evidence supporting discussion.
No or unsatisfactory discussion on how data informed plan for management of care.
Recommendations:
Propose a brief discharge plan addressing the most urgent issue for your patient (eg: diet, mobility, self- care) on discharge. Expected inclusion of other health disciplines which may support self-care on discharge
10% Comprehensive justification of prioritised patient discharge need.
Comprehensive relationship presented between other health disciplines and patient need. Good identification of prioritised patient discharge need.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH CHEAP NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
The post DESCRIBE EVENTS LEADING UP TO AND REASON/S FOR ADMISSION OF PATIENT. RATIONALE FOR ADMISSION WITH INCLUSION OF PATIENT RISKS. appeared first on Cheap Nursing Tutors.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
