Each answer must be at least 200 words. If any sources please cite them correctly and No Plagiarism

1. Kierkegaard, despite being a Christian, claimed that a pagan who prays passionately to a false god is more “in the truth” than a Christian who prays to the Christian God without passion. If Kierkegaard is right, what does this imply about the nature of religious faith? Do you think Kierkegaard is right about this? Why or why not?

2. When it comes to religious pluralism, John Hick is one of the most ardent and rigorous thinkers of the notion that no one religion has a monopoly on the truth. Each religion is a more or less inadequate and imperfect attempt to describe ultimate reality. Ultimately there is no one sacred writing that is perfect or superior to all others. No one great spiritual leader is hands-down “better” than any other. Yet, John Hick remained an active and practicing Christian his entire life. Critics often argue that Hick’s religious pluralism and his Christianity are in conflict. What do you think? Are religious pluralism and basic Christian doctrine compatible? Is Hick’s pluralist hypothesis really “Christian” in your view? Why or why not?

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.