NO PLAGIARISM AT ALL!! I WILL CHECK FOR PLAGIARISM
NO GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AT ALL .USE GRAMMARLY to help you!
MAKE SURE TO READ THE ARTICLE!! LINKED PROVIDED BELOW
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/153650…
Define race. Explain sociologists’ argument that race is a social and historical, rather than biological, construction
write an analytical synthesis of this article
I expect you to analyze, evaluate and reflect on the reading’s main argument, and how the author(s) arrived at this argument. These memos will require you to reflect on the following questions in addition to identifying the main argument. (Do not, however, just answer these questions. You must write your essay in paragraph form with connections between paragraphs
MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU”RE READING!!!
Directions: Memos should be formatted in the following way
Rubric: Your memo will be evaluated according to the following rubric. Each memo is worth 10 points total. I will give you 7 points for comprehensive & analysis and 3 points for clarity, writing, and organization.
Comprehensiveness & Analysis
|
7 points |
6 points |
5 points |
4 points |
3 points & below |
|
Clearly presents a main idea and supports it throughout the paper; Synthesis and analysis are exceptionallywell-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well-developed, supported with specific evidence, as well as examples and specific details. |
There is a main idea supported throughout most of the paper; Synthesis and analysis are well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence that is mostly specific. |
There is a main idea supported throughout most of the paper; analysis and synthesis is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature. |
There is a vague sense of a main idea; analysis and synthesis are vaguely sound and somewhat solid; ideas are present but are weakly developed and supported; very little evidence, and of a generalized nature. |
There is no main idea; analysis and synthesis are not sound. |
Clarity, Writing, and Organization
|
3 points |
2 points |
1 point and below |
|
Sentences are clear and varied in pattern, from simple to complex, with excellent use of punctuation. Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation. |
Sentences are clear but may lack variation; a few may be awkward and there may be a few punctuation errors. A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation, but not many. |
Sentences are generally clear but may have awkward structure or unclear content; there may be patterns of punctuation errors. Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation. Could also be a sign of lack of proof-reading. |

WhatsApp us