The criminalization of marijuana law homework help

March 12, 2023

essay about people activity writing homework help

March 12, 2023

managers deskbook 1

Project #2: Manager’s Deskbook

Company Background & Operating Environment

Use the assigned case study for information about “the company.”

Policy Issue & Plan of Action

The Manager’s Deskbook contains issue specific policies and implementation procedures which are required to mitigate risks to the company and to otherwise ensure good governance of the company’s operations. The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) and key CISO staff members held a kick-off meeting last week to identify issue specific policies which should be added to the company’s policy system in the IT Governance category. The policies will be disseminated throughout the company by incorporating them into the Manager’s Deskbook. The required issue specific policies are:

Data Breach Response Policy
Preventing / Controlling Shadow IT Policy
Management and Use of Corporate Social Media Accounts Policy
Corporate Domain Name Management Policy
Website Governance Policy

For the purposes of this assignment, you will create a policy recommendations briefing package (containing an Executive Summary and draft policies) and submit that to your instructor for grading.

Note: In a “real world” environment, the policy recommendations briefing package would be submitted to the IT Governance board for discussion and vetting. After revisions and voting, a package containing the accepted policies would be sent to all department heads and executives for comment and additional vetting. These comments would be combined and integrated into the policies and sent out for review again. It usually takes several rounds of review and comments before the policies can be sent to the Chief of Staff’s office for forwarding to the Corporate Governance Board. During the review & comments period, the policies will also be subjected to a thorough legal review by the company’s attorneys. Upon final approval by the Corporate Governance Board, the policies will be adopted and placed into the Manager’s Deskbook. This entire process can take 9 to 12 months, if not longer.

Your Task Assignment

As a staff member supporting the CISO, you have been asked to research and then draft an issue specific policy for each of the identified issues. These policies are to be written for MANAGERS and must identify the issue, explain what actions must be taken to address the issue (the company’s “policy”), state the required actions to implement the policy, and name the responsible / coordinating parties (by level, e.g. department heads, or by title on the organization chart). After completing your research and reviewing sample policies from other organizations, you will then prepare an “approval draft” for each issue specific policy.

The purpose of each issue specific policy is to address a specific IT governance issue that requires cooperation and collaboration between multiple departments within an organization.

Each issue specific policy should be no more than two typed pages in length (single space paragraphs with a blank line between).

You will need to be concise in your writing and only include the most important elements for each policy.

You may refer to an associated “procedure” if necessary, e.g. a Procedure for Requesting Issuance of a Third Level Domain Name (under the company’s Second Level Domain name) or a Procedure for Requesting Authorization to Establish a Social Media Account.

Your “approval drafts” will be combined with a one page Executive Summary (explaining why these issue specific policies are being brought before the IT Governance Board).

Research:

Review NIST’s definition of an “Issue Specific Policy” and contents thereof (NIST SP 800-14 p. 14)
Review the weekly readings and resource documents posted in the classroom. Pay special attention to the resources which contain “issues” and “best practices” information for:
Review NIST guidance for required / recommended security controls
If required, find additional sources which provide information about the IT security issues which require policy solutions.

Data Breach Response
Preventing / Controlling Shadow IT
Social Media
Corporate Domain Name Management
Website Governance
NIST SP 800-53 Access Control (AC) control family (for Social Media policy)
NIST SP 800-53 Incident Response (IR) control family (for Data Breach policy)

NIST SP 800-53 System and Services Acquisition (SA) control family (Domain Name, Shadow IT, Website Governance)

Write:

Prepare briefing package with approval drafts of the two IT related policies for the Manager’s Deskbook. Your briefing package must contain the following:
Use a professional format for your policy documents and briefing package. Your policy documents should be consistently formatted and easy to read.
Common phrases do not require citations. If there is doubt as to whether or not information requires attribution, provide a footnote with publication information or use APA format citations and references.
You are expected to write grammatically correct English in every assignment that you submit for grading. Do not turn in any work without (a) using spell check, (b) using grammar check, (c) verifying that your punctuation is correct and (d) reviewing your work for correct word usage and correctly structured sentences and paragraphs.

Executive Summary
“Approval Drafts” for
- Data Breach Response Policy
- Preventing / Controlling Shadow IT Policy
- Management and Use of Corporate Social Media Accounts Policy
- Corporate Domain Name Management Policy
- Website Governance Policy

As you write your policies, make sure that you address IT and cybersecurity concepts using standard terminology.

Executive Summary for the Policy Briefing Package	10 points The Executive Summary provided an excellent summary of the policy package’s purpose and contents. Information about the case study company was well integrated into the summary. Each policy was individually introduced and clearly explained. The material was well organized and easy to read.	8.5 points The Executive Summary provided an outstanding summary of the policy package’s purpose and contents. Information about the case study company was integrated into the summary. Each policy in the briefing package was individually introduced and briefly explained. The material was well organized and easy to read.	7 points The Executive Summary provided an acceptable overview of the contents of the policy package. Information about the case study company was used in the summary. Each policy in the briefing package was named and briefly explained.	6 points The Executive Summary provided an overview of the policy package. Information about the case study company was mentioned.	4 points An executive summary was provided but lacked details as to the purpose and contents of the policy package.(Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)	0 points No work submitted.
Data Breach Response Policy	Excellent	Outstanding	Acceptable	Needs Improvement	Needs Significant Improvement	Missing or Unacceptable
Policy Introduction	10 points The Data Breach Response policy contained an excellent introduction which clearly identified the policy issue and then addressed five or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments. The introduction clearly and concisely presented the major reasons why the company must have this policy.	8.5 points The Data Breach Response policy contained an outstanding introduction which clearly identified the policy issue and addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments. The introduction addressed the reasons why the company must have this policy.	7 points The introduction for the Data Breach Response policy identified the policy issue and addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments. The introduction mentioned at least one reason why the company must have this policy.	6 points The introduction to the Data Breach Response policy mentions the case study company and why the policy is required.	4 points The Data Breach Response policy was built from a sample template or list of “recommended” contents without customization for the case study company. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)	0 points No work submitted.
Policy Content	20 points The body of the policy provided an excellent description of the actions required to create and implement a data breach response plan. The policy identified the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was clear, concise, easy to understand, and appropriately organized.	18 points The body of the policy provided an outstanding description of the actions required to create and implement a data breach response plan. The policy identified the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was easy to understand, and appropriately organized.	16 points The body of the policy addressed the actions required to create and implement a data breach response plan. The policy identified the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy.	14 points The body of the policy identified most of the required actions for implementing data breach response and mentioned responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures.	10 points The policy was disorganized and difficult to understand. OR, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.	0 points No work submitted.
Shadow IT Policy	Excellent	Outstanding	Acceptable	Needs Improvement	Needs Significant Improvement	Missing or Unacceptable
Policy Introduction	10 points The Shadow IT Policy contained an excellent introduction which addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.	8.5 points The Shadow Policy contained an outstanding introduction which addressed two or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.	7 points The introduction for the Shadow IT Policy was customized for the case study company. One or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments were incorporated into the policy. Compliance requirements were addressed.	6 points The introduction to the Shadow IT Policy mentions the case study company and compliance requirements.	4 points The Shadow IT was built from a sample template or list of “recommended” contents without customization for the case study company. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)	0 points No work submitted.
Policy Content	15 points The body of the policy provided an excellent description of the required actions, the responsible parties, compliance requirements including audits, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was clear, concise, easy to understand, and appropriately organized.	13.5 points The body of the policy provided an outstanding description of the required actions, the responsible parties, compliance requirements including audits, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was easy to understand and appropriately organized.	12 points The body of the policy provided an acceptable description of the required actions. The policy mentioned at least two of the following: the responsible parties, compliance requirements including audits, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was easy to understand and appropriately organized.	9 points Organization and appearance need improvement. The Shadow IT policy mentioned compliance requirements for approval to purchase IT hardware, software, and services.	6 points The Shadow IT Policy was disorganized and difficult to understand. OR, the policy was significantly lacking in content. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)	0 points No work submitted.
Social Media Accounts Policy	Excellent	Outstanding	Acceptable	Needs Improvement	Needs Significant Improvement	Missing or Unacceptable
Policy Introduction	5 points The Social Media Accounts policy contained an excellent introduction which addressed five or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy.	4 points The Social Media Accounts policy contained an outstanding introduction which addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy.	3 points The introduction for the Social Media Accounts policy was customized for the case study company. Three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments were incorporated into the policy.	2 points The introduction to the Social Media Accounts policy mentions the case study company and why the policy is required.	1 point The policy was built from a template or list of “best practices” with no customization for the case study company. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)	0 points No work submitted.
Policy Content	10 points The body of the policy provided an excellent description of the required actions, the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy addressed all required actions listed in the assignment. The policy was clear, concise, easy to understand, and appropriately organized.	8.5 points The body of the policy provided an outstanding description of the required actions (as listed in the assignment), the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was clear, easy to understand, and appropriately organized.	7 points The body of the policy identified the required actions (as listed in the assignment), the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy.	6 points The body of the policy identified most of the required actions (as listed in the assignment) and mentioned responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures.	4 points The policy was disorganized and difficult to understand. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)	0 points No work submitted.
Professionalism	Excellent	Outstanding	Acceptable	Needs Improvement	Needs Significant Improvement	Missing or Unacceptable
Addressed security issues using standard terminology	5 points Demonstrated excellence in the use of standard cybersecurity terminology to support the deliverable. Appropriately used terminology from five or more pillars of IA/IS.	4 points Deliverable showed an outstanding understanding and integration of standard cybersecurity terminology. Appropriately used terminology from four or more pillars of IA/IS.	3 points Correctly used standard cybersecurity terminology in the deliverable. Appropriately used terminology from three or more pillars of IA/IS.	2 points Used standard cybersecurity terminology but this usage was not well integrated into the deliverable.	1 point Misused or incorrectly defined cybersecurity terminology.	0 points Did not integrate standard cybersecurity terminology into the deliverable.
Organization & Appearance	5 points Submitted work shows outstanding organization and the use of color, fonts, titles, headings and sub-headings, etc. is appropriate to the assignment type.	4 points Submitted work has minor style or formatting flaws but still presents a professional appearance. Submitted work is well organized and appropriately uses color, fonts, and section headings (per the assignment’s directions).	3 points Organization and/or appearance of submitted work could be improved through better use of fonts, color, titles, headings, etc. OR Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Professional appearance could be improved.	2 points Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Organization and professional appearance need substantial improvement.	1 point Submitted work meets minimum requirements but has major style and formatting errors. Work is disorganized and needs to be rewritten for readability and professional appearance.	0 points Submitted work is poorly organized and formatted. Writing and presentation are lacking in professional style and appearance. Work does not reflect college level writing skills. Or, no submission.
Execution	10 points No word usage, grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. All quotations (copied text) are properly marked and cited using a professional format (APA format recommended but not required.)	8.5 points Work contains minor errors in word usage,grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance. All quotations (copied text) are properly marked and cited using a professional format (APA format recommended but not required.)	7 points Errors in word usage, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from professional appearance of the submitted work. All quotations (copied text) are properly marked and cited using a professional format (APA format recommended but not required.)	6 points Submitted work has numerous errors in word usage, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from readability and professional appearance. Punctuation errors may include failure to properly mark quoted or copied material (an attempt to name original source is required).	4 points Submitted work is difficult to read / understand and has significant errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or word usage. Significant errors in presentation of copied text (lacks proper punctuation and failed to attribute material to original source).	0 points No work submitted. OR, work contains significant instances of cut-and-paste without proper citing / attribution to the original work or author.
Overall Score	Excellent 90 or more	Outstanding 80 or more	Acceptable 70 or more	Needs Improvement 56 or more	Needs Significant Improvement 36 or more	Missing or Unacceptable Work 0 or more

Executive Summary for the Policy Briefing Package

10 points

The Executive Summary provided an excellent summary of the policy package’s purpose and contents. Information about the case study company was well integrated into the summary. Each policy was individually introduced and clearly explained. The material was well organized and easy to read.

8.5 points

The Executive Summary provided an outstanding summary of the policy package’s purpose and contents. Information about the case study company was integrated into the summary. Each policy in the briefing package was individually introduced and briefly explained. The material was well organized and easy to read.

7 points

The Executive Summary provided an acceptable overview of the contents of the policy package. Information about the case study company was used in the summary. Each policy in the briefing package was named and briefly explained.

6 points

The Executive Summary provided an overview of the policy package. Information about the case study company was mentioned.

4 points

An executive summary was provided but lacked details as to the purpose and contents of the policy package.(Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)

0 points

No work submitted.

Data Breach Response Policy

Excellent

Outstanding

Acceptable

Needs Improvement

Needs Significant Improvement

Missing or Unacceptable

Policy Introduction

10 points

The Data Breach Response policy contained an excellent introduction which clearly identified the policy issue and then addressed five or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments. The introduction clearly and concisely presented the major reasons why the company must have this policy.

8.5 points

The Data Breach Response policy contained an outstanding introduction which clearly identified the policy issue and addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments. The introduction addressed the reasons why the company must have this policy.

7 points

The introduction for the Data Breach Response policy identified the policy issue and addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments. The introduction mentioned at least one reason why the company must have this policy.

6 points

The introduction to the Data Breach Response policy mentions the case study company and why the policy is required.

4 points

The Data Breach Response policy was built from a sample template or list of “recommended” contents without customization for the case study company. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)

0 points

No work submitted.

Policy Content

20 points

The body of the policy provided an excellent description of the actions required to create and implement a data breach response plan. The policy identified the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was clear, concise, easy to understand, and appropriately organized.

18 points

The body of the policy provided an outstanding description of the actions required to create and implement a data breach response plan. The policy identified the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was easy to understand, and appropriately organized.

16 points

The body of the policy addressed the actions required to create and implement a data breach response plan. The policy identified the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy.

14 points

The body of the policy identified most of the required actions for implementing data breach response and mentioned responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures.

10 points

The policy was disorganized and difficult to understand. OR, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.

0 points

No work submitted.

Shadow IT Policy

Excellent

Outstanding

Acceptable

Needs Improvement

Needs Significant Improvement

Missing or Unacceptable

Policy Introduction

10 points

The Shadow IT Policy contained an excellent introduction which addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.

8.5 points

The Shadow Policy contained an outstanding introduction which addressed two or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.

7 points

The introduction for the Shadow IT Policy was customized for the case study company. One or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments were incorporated into the policy. Compliance requirements were addressed.

6 points

The introduction to the Shadow IT Policy mentions the case study company and compliance requirements.

4 points

The Shadow IT was built from a sample template or list of “recommended” contents without customization for the case study company. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)

0 points

No work submitted.

Policy Content

15 points

The body of the policy provided an excellent description of the required actions, the responsible parties, compliance requirements including audits, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was clear, concise, easy to understand, and appropriately organized.

13.5 points

The body of the policy provided an outstanding description of the required actions, the responsible parties, compliance requirements including audits, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was easy to understand and appropriately organized.

12 points

The body of the policy provided an acceptable description of the required actions. The policy mentioned at least two of the following: the responsible parties, compliance requirements including audits, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was easy to understand and appropriately organized.

9 points

Organization and appearance need improvement. The Shadow IT policy mentioned compliance requirements for approval to purchase IT hardware, software, and services.

6 points

The Shadow IT Policy was disorganized and difficult to understand. OR, the policy was significantly lacking in content. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)

0 points

No work submitted.

Social Media Accounts Policy

Excellent

Outstanding

Acceptable

Needs Improvement

Needs Significant Improvement

Missing or Unacceptable

Policy Introduction

5 points

The Social Media Accounts policy contained an excellent introduction which addressed five or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy.

4 points

The Social Media Accounts policy contained an outstanding introduction which addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy.

3 points

The introduction for the Social Media Accounts policy was customized for the case study company. Three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments were incorporated into the policy.

2 points

The introduction to the Social Media Accounts policy mentions the case study company and why the policy is required.

1 point

The policy was built from a template or list of “best practices” with no customization for the case study company. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)

0 points

No work submitted.

Policy Content

10 points

The body of the policy provided an excellent description of the required actions, the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy addressed all required actions listed in the assignment. The policy was clear, concise, easy to understand, and appropriately organized.

8.5 points

The body of the policy provided an outstanding description of the required actions (as listed in the assignment), the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy. The policy was clear, easy to understand, and appropriately organized.

7 points

The body of the policy identified the required actions (as listed in the assignment), the responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures. Contact information is provided for questions about the policy.

6 points

The body of the policy identified most of the required actions (as listed in the assignment) and mentioned responsible parties, compliance requirements, and sanctions / disciplinary actions for compliance failures.

4 points

The policy was disorganized and difficult to understand. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)

0 points

No work submitted.

Professionalism

Excellent

Outstanding

Acceptable

Needs Improvement

Needs Significant Improvement

Missing or Unacceptable

Addressed security issues using standard terminology

5 points

Demonstrated excellence in the use of standard cybersecurity terminology to support the deliverable. Appropriately used terminology from five or more pillars of IA/IS.

4 points

Deliverable showed an outstanding understanding and integration of standard cybersecurity terminology. Appropriately used terminology from four or more pillars of IA/IS.

3 points

Correctly used standard cybersecurity terminology in the deliverable. Appropriately used terminology from three or more pillars of IA/IS.

2 points

Used standard cybersecurity terminology but this usage was not well integrated into the deliverable.

1 point

Misused or incorrectly defined cybersecurity terminology.

0 points

Did not integrate standard cybersecurity terminology into the deliverable.

Organization & Appearance

5 points

Submitted work shows outstanding organization and the use of color, fonts, titles, headings and sub-headings, etc. is appropriate to the assignment type.

4 points

Submitted work has minor style or formatting flaws but still presents a professional appearance. Submitted work is well organized and appropriately uses color, fonts, and section headings (per the assignment’s directions).

3 points

Organization and/or appearance of submitted work could be improved through better use of fonts, color, titles, headings, etc. OR Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Professional appearance could be improved.

2 points

Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Organization and professional appearance need substantial improvement.

1 point

Submitted work meets minimum requirements but has major style and formatting errors. Work is disorganized and needs to be rewritten for readability and professional appearance.

0 points

Submitted work is poorly organized and formatted. Writing and presentation are lacking in professional style and appearance. Work does not reflect college level writing skills. Or, no submission.

Execution

10 points

No word usage, grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. All quotations (copied text) are properly marked and cited using a professional format (APA format recommended but not required.)

8.5 points

Work contains minor errors in word usage,grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance. All quotations (copied text) are properly marked and cited using a professional format (APA format recommended but not required.)

7 points

Errors in word usage, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from professional appearance of the submitted work. All quotations (copied text) are properly marked and cited using a professional format (APA format recommended but not required.)

6 points

Submitted work has numerous errors in word usage, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from readability and professional appearance. Punctuation errors may include failure to properly mark quoted or copied material (an attempt to name original source is required).

4 points

Submitted work is difficult to read / understand and has significant errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or word usage. Significant errors in presentation of copied text (lacks proper punctuation and failed to attribute material to original source).

0 points

No work submitted. OR, work contains significant instances of cut-and-paste without proper citing / attribution to the original work or author.

Overall Score

Excellent
90 or more

Outstanding
80 or more

Acceptable
70 or more

Needs Improvement
56 or more

Needs Significant Improvement
36 or more

Missing or Unacceptable Work
0 or more

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.