Teacher’s updated command:
Hi Dandan: Moving forward, you will need to re-read my example in the assignment instructions and work towards refining ALL of your annotations. Please use single-spacing and you will need to use PAGE #’s as paragraphs aren’t clear.
100 of the 400 points possible is connected to the Personal Political Philosophy (PPP) assignment. 75 of the 100 points possible are linked to your creation of three separate annotations for three ACADEMIC JOURNAL articles. For examples, the supplementary readings for each module are academic journal articles. Whereas the topics focus on the module theme, you will search for articles on your own.
Once you have completed the preliminary steps for the PPP assignment, the hard work begins. When I say “shop” for articles, you must search for articles you find interesting. If you don’t like the article, then do not use it! Hopefully, you have read HOW TO READ A RESEARCH ARTICLE and have practiced the steps provided for our supplementary reading. This is essential for writing an annotation because it forms the basis of your ANALYSIS (comprehension) of the ideas in the articles you selected.
So, to write an annotation:
Assignment requirement:
For example, take the Colin Kaepernick and now, larger NFL workplace-protest controversy. This is evidence of personal political philosophies, or the deep-seeded reactions you have to situations. These reactions are often emotional–as politics ideals with everything you care about–yet they are LEARNED behaviors. Are you reacting or listening?
To truly know where you stand is to first identify the political philosophy you mostly likely learned from parents and/or other family. More recently, you may have gravitated towards “friends” who share learned reactions. Then the discomfort of it all: when there is nuance in what it means to be “progressive,” or “conservative.” Most individuals believe they are unique and therefore so are their political inclinations, but with just a few broad terms, how can this be so? This is a classical philosophical question that is answered in pursuing an investigation of yourself through the literature of political science THEORY. No one theory describes you any better than a political party affiliation, although there is much more specificity.
I’ll use myself as an example. My household was “democrat” and yet the city of Pittsburgh is hardly a liberal bastion like Seattle. Even though I wasn’t Catholic, I attended a high school that was and most students were uninterested in politics. At university, many consider themselves “liberal” but then stop asking WHY there is so much nuance with diversity. It is challenging to be this open-minded to your own assumptions. But I pressed forward with a variety of coursework in the social sciences. When I first started teaching in Seattle, I was forced to address the more conservative elements of my “liberal” identity. As I developed this assignment, I again used myself as a model, and I uncovered that I’m radical. That freaked me out; I don’t advocate violence to achieve political outcomes, but there is such a strong association with violence and radical politics. To sort this out, my literature review brought me to “contemporary intellectual radicalism.” From there, the literature became a part of my life-long evolution of how I view myself politically. This process is a snapshot in time, so what you are now can change and probably will.
So, how do you do this?
Some important things to note:
This is about and for you. I cannot tell you who you are, but I can ask that you clarify using the language of our discipline. Therefore, it is without question that you must use academic journals to do this assignment. Occasionally, students find access to particular journals that are not in EBSCO or JStor, and while this is fine–YOU MUST CHECK WITH ME BEFORE USING IT. Otherwise, you could waste a lot of time working on something I will not accept.

WhatsApp us