Stage 3:Requirements
Before you begin work on this assignment, be sure you have read the Case Study and reviewed the feedback received on your Stage 2 assignment.
Overview
As the business analyst in the CIO’s department of Chesapeake IT Consulting (CIC), your next task in developing your Business Analysis and System Recommendation (BA&SR) Report is to develop a set of requirements for the hiring system.
Assignment – BA&SR Section III – Requirements
The first step is to incorporate the feedback you received on your Stage 2 assignment, making any needed corrections or adjustments.(If you have not incorporated the feedback from your Stage 1 assignment, you should do so prior to submitting Stage 3.) Part of the grading criteria for Stage 4 submission includes addressing previous feedback to improve the final report.For this assignment, you will add Section III of the Business Analysis and System Recommendation (BA&SR) Report by identifying requirements for the new hiring system. This analysis leads into Section IV – System Recommendation of the BA&SR (Stage 4 assignment) that will analyze a proposed IT solution to ensure it meets CIC’s organizational strategy and fulfill its operational needs.
Using the case study, assignment instructions, Course Content readings, and external resources, develop your Section III: Requirements. The case study tells you that the executives and employees at Chesapeake IT Consultants (CIC) have identified a need for an effective and efficient applicant tracking or hiring system. As you review the case study, use the assignment instructions to take notes to assist in your analysis. In particular, look for information in the interviews to provide stakeholder interests and needs.
Use the outline format, headings and tables provided and follow all formatting instructions below.
III.Requirements
|
Role |
Specific problems related to the hiring process |
How a technology solution to support the hiring process could address the challenge |
|
i.CEO |
||
|
ii. CFO |
||
|
iii. CIO |
||
|
iv. Director of Human Resources |
||
|
v. Manager of Recruiting |
||
|
vi. Recruiters |
||
|
vii. Administrative Assistant |
||
|
viii. Hiring Manager (Functional supervisor the new employee would be working for.) |
B. Defining Requirements – The next step is to identify the essential requirements for the information system. In addition to the stakeholder interests identified above, review the Case Study, especially the interviews, highlighting any statements that tell what the person expects the system to do.Functional requirements express specifically what the user needs the system to do.This can be in terms of tasks the users need to perform, data they need to input, what the system might do with that data input, and output required. Non-Functional requirements express how the system will perform in several performance areas and security.As a member of the CIO’s organization, you will use your professional knowledge to Identify 5 Functional Requirements (including one specifically related to reporting) and 5 Non-Functional Requirements (including 2 security-related requirements).Refer to Week 6 content on requirements; security requirements are covered in Chapter 6 of the textbook. Additional research can expand your knowledge of these areas.
Once you have identified the 10 requirements, evaluate each one using the criteria below and create 10 well-written requirements for the new hiring system.
The requirement statement:
For a full requirement specification, there will be many requirements statements; you only need to provide the number of requirements identified for each category.Do not provide generic statements but relate to the needs of CIC to improve its hiring process.
(Provide an introductory sentence, copy the table, and complete the Requirements Statement and Stakeholder columns. No additional information should be entered into the first column, Requirement ID.)
|
Requirement ID
|
Requirement Statement |
Stakeholder (Position and Name from Case Study that identified this requirement) |
|
Functional Requirements |
|
|
|
Example |
The system shall store all information from the candidate’s application/resume in a central applicant database. |
Recruiter – Paul O’Brien |
|
1. |
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
4. |
||
|
5. (Reporting) |
||
|
Non-Functional Requirements |
||
|
Example |
The system shall be implemented as a Software as a Service solution. |
CIO – Fadil Abadi |
|
1. |
||
|
2. |
||
|
3. |
||
|
4. (Security) |
||
|
5. (Security) |
Formatting Your Assignment
Consider your audience – you are writing in the role of a CIC business analyst and your audience is CIC and your boss, the CIO.Don’t discuss CIC as if the reader has no knowledge of the organization.Use third person consistently throughout the report.In third person, the writer avoids the pronouns I, we, my, and ours. The third person is used to make the writing more objective by taking the individual, the “self,” out of the writing. This method is very helpful for effective business writing, a form in which facts, not opinion, drive the tone of the text. Writing in the third person allows the writer to come across as unbiased and thus more informed.
GRADING RUBRIC:
|
Criteria |
90-100%
Far Above Standards |
80-89%
Above Standards |
70-79%
Meets Standards |
60-69%
Below Standards |
< 60%
Well Below Standards |
Possible Points |
|
Stakeholder Interests Identification of specific stakeholder interests and objectives for improving the hiring process and how a technology system could address.Generally, 0-3 points per role. |
22-24 Points Challenges and how a technology solution will address are clearly described and fully explained using a sophisticated level of writing. |
20-21 Points Challenges and how a technology solution will address are clearly described and explained using an effective level of writing. |
17-19 Points Challenges and how a technology solution will address are described and explained. |
15-16 Points Challenges and how a technology solution will address are not clearly described and explained; and/or lacks effective presentation of information |
0-14 Points Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort and/or is not original work for this class section. |
24 |
|
Functional Requirements 5 user requirements (1 addresses reporting) Generally, 0-5 points each |
23-25 Points Correctly identified and sourced; clearly derived from the Case Study; demonstrates sophisticated analysis. |
20-22 Points Identified and sourced; requirements are derived from the Case Study; demonstrates effective analysis. |
17-19 Points Identified and sourced; requirements are related to the Case Study. |
15-16 Points Fewer than 5 requirements are identified and sourced; and/or information provided is not correct; and/or requirements are not all related to the Case Study. |
0-14 Points Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort and/or is not original work for this class section. |
25 |
|
Non-Functional Requirements 3 system performance requirements and 2 system security requirements Generally, 0-5 points each
|
23-25 Points Correctly identified and sourced; clearly derived from the Case Study; demonstrates sophisticated analysis. |
20-22 Points Identified and sourced; requirements are derived from the Case Study; demonstrates effective analysis. |
17-19 Points Identified and sourced; requirements are related to the Case Study. |
15-16 Points Fewer than 5 requirements are identified and sourced; and/or information provided is not correct; and/or requirements are not all related to the Case Study. |
0-14 Points Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort and/or is not original work for this class section. |
25 |
|
Research Two or more sources–one source from within the IFSM 300 course content and one external (other than the course materials) |
9-10 Points Required resources are incorporated and used effectively. Sources used are relevant and timely and contribute strongly to the analysis.References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style. |
8.5 Points
At least two sources are incorporated and are relevant and somewhat support the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style.
|
7.5 Points Only one resource is used and properly incorporated and/or reference(s) lack correct APA style. |
6.5 Points A source may be used, but is not properly incorporated or used, and/or is not effective or appropriate; and/or does not follow APA style for references and citations. |
0-5 Points No course content or external research incorporated; or reference listed is not cited within the text. |
10 |

WhatsApp us