THIS IS ONLY AN INTERPRETATION, FIVE SENTENCES AND A QUESTION IS ALL I NEED. TELL ME YOUR THOUGHTS, HAVE REFERENCES

• Suggest additional criteria for determining whether an article is peer-reviewed.
• Offer an additional situation in which using a resource that is not peer-reviewed would be acceptable.In the library it is difficult to find peer review article, especially when you search a sort title such as “Civil Laws”. Although there is an option on the Walden University Library website to select rather you want to search only peer review articles, it seems to give you articles that don’t coincide with the topic you’re looking for. Matt states that scholarly articles can come in all shapes and sizes depending on the subject being covered and the type of research being performed. For example, a scholarly article by an expert in the Humanities will write what is called a literature review, wherein they discuss a work of art (book, painting, etc …) and their research will be based off of what previous experts have written about that piece. However, a scholarly article by an expert in a Science field may write about an experiment they have performed, and discuss their results and how it relates to previous research (Matt, 2011). The article I choose which is considered an academic journal title is “Diversity, disparate impact, and discrimination pursuant to Title VII of US civil rights laws”. This particular article proved to be a peer reviewed article based on the purpose, findings and research of the journal. The disadvantages of peer review writings is that peer reviewers have not got an easy job spotting conflicts of interest, such as the source of a researcher’s funding, only that the research was followed to acceptable protocols (Shuttleworth, 2018). According to Shuttleworth there are no grading systems about the quality of the peer review. Different journals have different standards, and there is no way to know the expertise and quality of the reviewers or editor. In the past, less reputable journals generally had a smaller readership, but the internet has made them just as likely to be accessed and used. Shuttleworth also states that the advantages of peer reviews is that peer reviewing allows a diversity of opinions to be brought to the table, theoretically removing any personal biases and pre-set ideas from the equation. The peer review process stops a lot of substandard and poor science from reaching publication. In addition, the reviewers are generally experts in their field, well acquainted with the latest developments. They can, therefore, reject duplicate research and plagiarized papers (Shuttleworth, 2018). Cavico, F. J., & Mujtaba, B. (2017). Diversity, disparate impact, and discrimination pursuant to Title VII of US civil rights laws. Equality, Diversity & Inclusion, 36(7), 670. doi:10.1108/EDI-04-2017-0091 Matt. (2011). PIONEERS. Retrieved from https://pioneersread.wordpress.com/2011/08/31/5-ways-to-tell-if-the-article-is-scholarly-aka-peer-reviewed-aka-academic/ Shuttleworth, Martyn. (2018). EXPOLRABLES: Disadvantages of Peer Reviews. Retrieved from https://explorable.com/disadvantages-of-peer-revie…

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.