What is National Opt-Out Day, according to Shachtman?

 

Passenger Screening Policies Violate Privacy and Do Not Ensure Security US Airport Security, 2013Listen Even the most modest of us would probably agree to a brief flash of quasi-nudity if it would really ensure a safe flight. That?s not the deal the [Transportation Security Administration] is offering. Noah Shachtman is a contributing editor at Wired magazine and a nonresident fellow at the Brookings Institution. In the following viewpoint, he maintains that the enhanced passenger screening policies implemented by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) are ineffective and invasive. Shachtman points out that terrorists have already figured out ways to work around the full-body scanners, rendering them of limited value. However, he is encouraged by the TSA?s adoption of a more risk-based system that focuses on true threats to airport security. As you read, consider the following questions: ? What is National Opt-Out Day, according to Shachtman? ? How many scanners does Shachtman say there were in sixty-eight airports as of 2010? ? How many more TSA employees does Shachtman say were needed to man the scanners? In May [2010], Transportation Security Administration [TSA] screener Rolando Negrin pummeled a coworker with government-issued baton. The feud began, according to a Miami-Dade Police Department report, after Mr. Negrin?s training session with one of the agency?s whole-body imagers. The scan revealed [Mr. Negrin] had a small penis, the disgruntled coworker told police. After a few months, he could not take the jokes anymore and lost mind. Now the TSA is rolling out thultra-revealing imagers across the country in an attempt to uncover hidden threats like the so-called underwear bomb found on a Detroit-bound flight last Christmas [in 2009]. The agency and the scanners? manufacturers insist they?ve installed featuand instituted proceduthat will make passenger embarrassments impossible. The Backlash Against Body Scanning Privacy advocates aren?t buying it. They?ve sued the Department of Homeland Security, asking a federal judge for an emergency stay of the body-scanning program. They?re also calling on passengers to refuse the scans next week during a National Opt-Out Day. Separately, unions representing American Airlines and US Airways pilots told their members to skip the screeningson Opt-Out Day and every other. But the larger question is whether the TSA?s tech-centric approach to security makes any sense at all. Even the most modest of us would probably agree to a brief flash of quasi-nudity if it would really ensure a safe flight. That?s not the deal the TSA is offering. Instead, the agency is asking for Rolando Negrin-style revelations in exchange for incremental, uncertain security improvements against particular kinds of concealed weapons. Magical Thinking It?s the same kind of trade-off TSA implicitly provided when it ordered us to take off our sneakers (to stop shoe bombs) and to chuck our water bottles (to prevent liquid explosives). Security guru Bruce Schneier, a plaintiff in the scanner suit, calls tmagical thinking ? descend on what the terrorists happened to do last time, and we?ll all be safe. As if they won?t think of something else. Which, of course, they invariably do. Attackers are already starting to smuggle weapons in body cavities, going where even the most adroit body scanners do not tread. No wonder that the Israelis, known for the world?s most stringent airport security, have so far passed on the scanners. Today, 373 are installed in 68 U.S. airports. One thousand machines are supposed to be in place by the end of next year. And the [President Barack] Obama administration has requested 5,355 additional employees to man the scannersat a cost of $219 million in the first year alone. The only alternative to the screeners will be a pat down from a TSA worker. The TSA uses two models of body scanner. One zaps the passenger with a tiny amount of X-rays that penetrate the clothes, but stop at the skin. The other scanner uses millimeter wavesa close cousin of microwavesto pull off the same trick. (Regarding radiation exposure, the FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] says there?s no more than a minimal risk to people being scanned.) By measuring the direction and frequency of the waves that come back, the system can tell what?s beneath a traveler?s garments. A Privacy Problem? TSA officials say that?s not a privacy problem. Under new TSA guidelines, they point out, the person looking at the scanned image is in an entirely separate room, and the picture is deleted as soon as the next passenger steps into the scanner. The images themselves are also altered for modestyat least for the moment. TSA officials even claim that Mr. Negrin?s privates weren?t really exposed. Rapiscan Systems, which makes the backscatter X-ray scanner, installs one of a series of privacy algorithms that can dial up or down the images? resolution. (Of course, the fuzzier the result, the harder it is to spot a weapon.) Similarly, millimeter scanner-maker L-3 can blur faces, chests and groins, depending on the customer?s preference. Individual employees, the companies promise, will not be able to alter thsettings. However, top authorities at TSA will have the flexibility to make a policy change. They can keep the images comparatively blurryor not. A Risk-Based Approach There may be an important policy shift in the works. TSA has long hewed to an unthinking, unbending approach to security that brought the agency a level of admiration ordinarily reserved for health insurers. But in first five months running the agency, TSA chief John [S.] Pistole has sent some encouraging signs that he?s absorbed the arguments of TSA?s critics. We can?t just look for prohibited items on a list. We?ve got to provide the best security while giving greater scrutiny to those who ngreater scrutiny, and not using a cookie-cutter approach for everybody, he says. But Mr. Pistole holds to view about body scanners? important role in the future of aviation security, adding that the TSA is looking into new privacy enhancements. Unfortunately for Rolandoand the rest of usthe scanners appear to be here to stay. Further Readings Books ? Joseba Altarescu and Taro Bai, eds. Aviation and Passenger Security. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2012. ? David H. Brown Full Body Scam: The Naked View of Current Airport Security. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse, 2011. ? Bartholomew Elias Airport and Aviation Security: U.S. Policy and Strategy in the Age of Global Terrorism. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2010. ? Kip Hawley and Nathan Means Permanent Emergency: Inside the TSA and the Fight for the Future of American Security. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. ? Susan N. Herman Taking Liberties: The War on Terror and the Erosion of American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. ? Barbara Hudson and Synnove Ugelvik, eds. Justice and Security in the 21st Century: Risks, Rights and the Rule of Law. New York: Routledge, 2012. ? Natalia Ippolito I Might as Well Be Naked: How to Survive Airport Screening with Your Clothes On. Enka, NC: Divineisland Books, 2007. ? James Lutz and Brenda Lutz Terrorism: The Basics. New York: Routledge, 2011. ? Gus Martin Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2010. ? Harvey Molotch Against Security: How We Go Wrong at Airports, Subways, and Other Sites of Ambiguous Danger. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012. ? Lori Peek Behind the Backlash: Muslim Americans After 9/11. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, 2011. ? Jeffrey C. Price and Jeffrey S. Forrest Practical Aviation Security: Predicting and Preventing Future Threats. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier, 2009. ? Dana Priest and William M. Arkin Top Secret America: The Rise of the New American Security State. New York: Little, Brown and Co., 2011. ? Dan Reuter and John Yoo, eds. Confronting Terror: 9/11 and the Future of American National Security. New York: Encounter Books, 2011. ? Mark B. Salter, ed. Politics at the Airport. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008. ? Bruce Schneier Schneier on Security. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley, 2008. ? Paul Seidenstat and Francis X. Splane Protecting Airline Passengers in the Age of Terrorism. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Security International, 2009. ? David K. Shipler The Rights of the People: How the Search for Safety Invades Our Liberties. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2011. ? Daniel J. Solove Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff Between Privacy and Security. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011. ? Susan B. Trento and Joseph J. Trento Unsafe at Any Altitude: Exposing the Illusion of Aviation Security. Hanover, NH: Steerforth Press, 2007. ? David Tucker Illuminating the Dark Arts of War: Terrorism, Sabotage, and Subversion in Homeland Security and the New Conflict. London: Continuum, 2012. ? George Weigel Faith, Reason, and the War Against Jihadism: A Call to Action. New York: Doubleday, 2009. Periodicals ? Locke Bowman Airport Security: For What It?s Worth, Huffington Post, June 27, 2011. ? Grand Rapids Press New Airport Body Scanners Necessary Tool in Fight Against Terrorism, August 25, 2010. ? Gene Healy Hassling the Innocent Is TSA?s Specialty, DC Examiner, January 29, 2012. ? Kevin Huffman How Much Will We Do to Ensure the Terrorists Don?t Win?, PostPartisan (blog), Washington Post, November 19, 2010. ? Darrell Issa Less Privacy, No Added Security, National Review Online, December 6, 2010. ? Thomas E. McNamara To Find the Needles, Reduce the Haystack, Los Angeles Times, November 21, 2010. ? Joanna Molloy Rant on Airport Security ?Groin Check? Goes Viral, but Curb the OutrageSafety Is at Stake,New York Daily News, November 16, 2010. ? Janet Napolitano Napolitano: Scanners Are Safe, Pat-Downs Discreet, USA Today, November 14, 2010. ? David Rittgers Body Scanners: The Naked Truth, New York Post, November 17, 2010. ? Michael Scott First a Hand on Your Crotch, Next a Boot in Your Face, CounterPunch, November 24, 2010. ? Adam Serwer Why We Are Angry at the TSA, American Prospect, November 17, 2010. Full Text: COPYRIGHT 2013 Greenhaven Press, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. Source Citation Shachtman, Noah. Passenger Screening Policies Violate Privacy and Do Not Ensure Security. US Airport Security. Ed. Margaret Haerens and Lynn M. Zott. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from Has Airport Security Gone Too Far? Wall Street Journal 17 Nov. 2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 3 Mar. 2016. URL https://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010858213&source=Bookmark&u=king56371&jsid=703fa6142725ff5ab9a23a87ddc94f6a

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH CHEAP NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

The post What is National Opt-Out Day, according to Shachtman? appeared first on Cheap Nursing Tutors.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.