Would a paper-based scan of a paper-based record be an EHR? What are 2 limitations and advantages of such a system based on scans only?

Explain the value that professional nursing organizations have in networking and in the legislative process. Provie a rationale for your response.
June 10, 2021
Explain the laws that relate to adolescent safety and health privacy in a school setting.
June 10, 2021

Would a paper-based scan of a paper-based record be an EHR? What are 2 limitations and advantages of such a system based on scans only?

Would a paper-based scan of a paper-based record be an EHR? What are 2 limitations and advantages of such a system based on scans only?

 

Would a paper-based scan of a paper-based record be an EHR? What are 2 limitations and advantages of such a system based on scans only? Since beginning my pursuit of a Masters degree in eHealth, I have noticed a great deal of variability in what can be considered an electronic health record (EHR). According to the National Alliance for Health Information Technology, an electronic health record is a record of health-related information on an individual that conforms to nationally recognized interoperability standards and that can be created, managed, and consulted by authorized clinicians and staff across more than one health care organization1. When using this definition to assess whether or not a paper-based scan of a health record should be considered an EHR, there are a couple key words that I paid attention to. First, the EHR must be created, managed, and consulted. When considering a paper-based scan of a health record, the record is created when it is scanned into the clinic or hospitals patient system. Once the scan is uploaded, these documents can be managed and organized within the system. Given current technology, however, this method of managing records is not ideal. When physicians or other healthcare professionals consult this record for future reference, I believe it meets the minimum criteria, but again this situation is not ideal. The second part of this definition that I focused on was that in an EHR, patient records must be accessible across more than one health care organization, which implies interoperability. As scanned paper records can be sent between healthcare organizations, I believe having scanned patient records again meets the minimum criteria. Although I believe a paper-based scan of a patient record meets the minimum criteria for an EHR as outlined by the National Alliance for Health Information Technology, I do not believe a paper-based scanning system exemplifies the true potential of an EHR. Systems that…; Would a paper-based scan of a paper-based record be an EHR? What are 2 limitations and advantages of such a system based on scans only? Since beginning my pursuit of a Masters degree in eHealth, I have noticed a great deal of variability in what can be considered an electronic health record (EHR). According to the National Alliance for Health Information Technology, an electronic health record is a record of health-related information on an individual that conforms to nationally recognized interoperability standards and that can be created, managed, and consulted by authorized clinicians and staff across more than one health care organization1. When using this definition to assess whether or not a paper-based scan of a health record should be considered an EHR, there are a couple key words that I paid attention to. First, the EHR must be created, managed, and consulted. When considering a paper-based scan of a health record, the record is created when it is scanned into the clinic or hospitals patient system. Once the scan is uploaded, these documents can be managed and organized within the system. Given current technology, however, this method of managing records is not ideal. When physicians or other healthcare professionals consult this record for future reference, I believe it meets the minimum criteria, but again this situation is not ideal. The second part of this definition that I focused on was that in an EHR, patient records must be accessible across more than one health care organization, which implies interoperability. As scanned paper records can be sent between healthcare organizations, I believe having scanned patient records again meets the minimum criteria. Although I believe a paper-based scan of a patient record meets the minimum criteria for an EHR as outlined by the National Alliance for Health Information Technology, I do not believe a paper-based scanning system exemplifies the true potential of an EHR. Systems that…


 

smilesmilePLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH CHEAP NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

get-your-custom-paper






The post Would a paper-based scan of a paper-based record be an EHR? What are 2 limitations and advantages of such a system based on scans only? appeared first on Cheap Nursing Tutors.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Buy Custom Nursing Papers