Writing Persuasively Assignment

Assignment: Writing Persuasively

Consider the differences between the characteristics of a literature review for academic writing and the characteristics of a review of literature for the purposes of crafting a compelling and persuasive need statement.

For this Assignment:

Review this week’s readings. Pay particular attention to the Persuasive Essay Samples at the Academic Help website as well as the “Why Academics Have a Hard Time Writing Good Grant Proposals” article.
Carefully read the Literature Review in the Week 4 Assignment: Writing Persuasively document located in this week’s Learning Resources. Focus on the scenario it describes and consider how the content in this document would be translated into a persuasive argument.

Assignment (1 page)

Apply the characteristics of persuasive writing to turn the Literature Review into a persuasive argument.
Be sure that:
- The persuasive argument begins with a strong hook or compelling statement that introduces the topic to the intended audience.
- The position taken by the author is clearly evident throughout.
- Word choice, tone, and points made are designed to resonate with the intended audience.
- The persuasive argument presents a firm position that is supported by facts and examples from the Literature Review.
- An opposing viewpoint is appropriately refuted and supported by facts and examples from the Literature Review.
- The persuasive argument culminates with a brief compelling conclusion.

BY DAY 7

Submit your Assignment.

https://academichelp.net/samples/academics/essays/…

3 days ago

Full Text from ERIC Available online: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ902223

3 days ago

Porter, R. (2007). Why academics have a hard time writing good grant proposals. Journal of Research Administration, 38(2), 37–43.

3 days ago

Why Academics Have a Hard Time Writing Good Grant Proposals

Author(s):

Porter, Robert

Source:

Journal of Research Administration, v38 n2 p37-43 Fall 2007. 7 pp.

Peer Reviewed:

Yes

ISSN:

1539-1590

Descriptors:

Academic Discourse,
Faculty Publishing,
Writing for Publication,
Proposal Writing,
Comparative Analysis,
Writing Skills,
Researchers,
Grants,
Writing Strategies,
Communication (Thought Transfer),
Research Design,
Peer Evaluation,
Time Management,
Higher Education

Abstract:

When they are new to the grant game, even scholars with fine publishing records can struggle with proposal writing. Many are surprised to find that the writing style that made them successful as academics is not well suited to crafting a winning proposal. To succeed at grant writing, most researchers need to learn a new set of writing skills. This paper discusses the contrasting perspectives of academic prose versus grant writing, and lists strategies grant specialists can use to help researchers break old habits and replace them with techniques better suited to the world of competitive grant proposals. (Contains 1 table.)

Abstractor:

ERIC

Number of References:

Number of Pages:

Publication Type:

Journal Articles; Reports – Descriptive

Availability:

Full Text from ERIC Available online:
http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ902223

Society of Research Administrators International. 500 North Washington Street Suite 300, Falls Church, VA 22046. Tel: 703-741-0140; Fax: 703-741-0142; e-mail: membership@srainternational.org; Web site:
http://www.srainternational.org

URL:

http://www.srainternational.org/sra03/template/tnt…

Journal Code:

JAN2017

Entry Date:

2010

Accession Number:

EJ902223

Database:

ERIC

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.